varying type car accidents

What constitutes an “Accident” under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule? Every person who owns a car in Ontario is required to have a valid motor vehicle insurance policy.  All motor vehicle insurance policies in Ontario provide for Statutory Accident Benefits.  If you are involved in an “accident”, you are entitled to apply to receive accident…

Hourglass and clock

A limitation period is the period of time between the accident and when an action must be started or a notice given. These limitation periods are extremely important since, if you do not meet the timelines, then your right to recover damages might be lost. After a car accident there are a few limitation periods…

In Ontario, automobile insurance runs under a “no-fault” system. “No-fault” does not mean that no one is at fault, or that it doesn’t matter whose fault the accident is. In terms of Accident Benefits, “no-fault” means that, regardless of who is to blame for the accident, anyone who is injured may receive some compensation. It is this…

construction on brick wall

On May 31, 2017, Bill 142 was introduced at Queen’s Park.  The aim of the Bill is to modernize the Construction Lien Act.  There are a number of proposed changes to the act that will impact how payments are made to contractors, the adjudication of construction disputes and a contractor’s lien right. There are two…

Review of settlement and calculations

The Ontario government recently introduced a minor change to Section 267.5(9) of the Insurance Act.  The change, while minor, will have a big impact on how Plaintiff’s lawyers assess Rule 49 Offers to Settle presented by Defendants. Section 267.5(9) of the Insurance Act, now states “in an action for loss or damage from bodily injury…

Gavel and Dollar Sign Costs of Law

When a lawsuit goes to trial, the general rule is that the successful party will have at least some of its costs (legal fees) paid by the unsuccessful party. This can be a significant risk for a Plaintiff who does not have the money to pay. In the last several years, there has been a…

In the recent decision of Wardak v. Froom, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice had the opportunity to review the principles relating to the liability of a social host. The Court began by reviewing the 2006 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Childs v. Desormeaux. In the Childs case, the Plaintiff was paralyzed…

The decision of Daggitt v. Campbell, 2016 ONSC 2742 was recently released.  Madam Justice MacLeod-Beliveau was asked on a motion to compel a plaintiff to attend a defence psychiatry examination.  The plaintiff opposed the motion on two grounds.  First there was insufficient evidence to support the need for a psychiatry assessment.  Second, the plaintiff argued…

fastening a seat belt in the car

When a driver or passenger in a vehicle fails to wear a seat belt, they are clearly taking a risk with their safety. There might also be legal consequences if they are in a car accident and are not wearing their seat belt. The Ontario Court of Appeal has provided us with some guidance on…

cyclists in bike lane

The City of Ottawa has opened a number of bike lanes downtown that are causing concern for cyclists and motorist alike. There is a new bike lane on O’Connor Street which has reduced the vehicle traffic by one lane, causing headaches for motorists and confusion for cyclists.  In order to safely share the road, there…

Page 1 of 21 2

© 2016 Tierney Stauffer LLP | Ottawa • Cornwall • Arnprior • Kingston • North Bay

logo-footer

STAY CONNECTED WITH US:          

Online Marketing by seoplus+